Ethereum Whale Shock: Massive Hidden ETH Holder Finally Revealed in New On-Chain Report
Ethereum’s Biggest Holders Revealed: Binance, Coinbase, and Institutional Giants Control Billions in Liquid ETH
A new research report from Arkham Intelligence has shed fresh light on the concentration of Ethereum ownership, revealing which entities control the largest non-staked balances of ETH worldwide. Unlike broader supply analyses that include staked tokens locked in protocol contracts, Arkham’s data focuses specifically on liquid and custodial holdings. This narrower lens offers a clearer view of which institutions and centralized platforms hold Ethereum that can actively influence liquidity, trading flows, and market structure.
The findings underscore a pivotal transformation in Ethereum’s ownership landscape. Once dominated by early adopters and retail participants, Ethereum is now increasingly concentrated in the hands of centralized exchanges and institutional players. Together, these entities control millions of ETH worth tens of billions of dollars at current market prices.
As Ethereum matures into a globally recognized financial asset, the implications of concentrated ownership extend far beyond simple wallet rankings. They speak to liquidity dynamics, systemic risk, regulatory exposure, and the evolving balance of power within the crypto ecosystem.
Binance Tops the List of Liquid ETH Holders
According to Arkham’s report, Binance holds the largest non-staked Ethereum balance globally, with approximately 4.16 million ETH under custody. At prevailing market rates, that figure translates to nearly $13 billion in value.
The ranking is not entirely surprising. As the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume, Binance manages vast reserves of digital assets on behalf of its global user base. The ETH held by Binance is largely custodial in nature, meaning it belongs to customers who store their assets on the platform rather than in self-custodied wallets.
This distinction is important. While Binance technically controls the private keys to these holdings, the underlying ownership is distributed among millions of retail and institutional users. Nevertheless, the exchange’s aggregated wallet balances represent a significant concentration of Ethereum liquidity in a single custodial entity.
Such scale carries both advantages and risks. On one hand, large custodial balances facilitate deep liquidity pools and efficient price discovery. On the other, they raise concerns about systemic vulnerability should operational disruptions or regulatory pressures affect the platform.
Coinbase Strengthens Its Role as Institutional Custodian
Trailing Binance but still commanding an enormous share of liquid ETH is Coinbase. The U.S.-based exchange reportedly holds approximately 2.9 million ETH in non-staked balances.
Coinbase’s position reflects its expanding role as a custodian for institutional investors, publicly traded companies, and ETF issuers. In recent years, Coinbase has become the preferred infrastructure provider for regulated investment vehicles seeking exposure to digital assets.
Unlike Binance’s more globally diversified user base, Coinbase’s holdings are closely tied to U.S. institutional demand. The exchange’s compliance-focused strategy and regulatory transparency have made it a key gateway for traditional finance entering the Ethereum market.
The scale of Coinbase’s ETH reserves illustrates how institutional capital flows are reshaping Ethereum’s ownership profile. As ETF adoption grows and corporate treasury allocations increase, custodial balances at regulated exchanges are likely to remain elevated.
BitMNR Emerges as a Strategic Ethereum Accumulator
One of the most notable additions to Arkham’s ranking is BitMNR, an entity reportedly linked to Fundstrat. According to the report, BitMNR holds approximately 4.1 million ETH.
Unlike exchange holdings, these assets are not custodial. Instead, Arkham indicates that BitMNR is building a long-term Ethereum treasury position. The strategy reportedly aims to accumulate up to 5 percent of Ethereum’s total supply over time.
If realized, such a position would place BitMNR among the most influential ETH holders globally.
The implications of this strategy are significant. A sustained accumulation effort of that magnitude could materially reduce the circulating liquid supply of Ethereum. By absorbing large quantities of ETH into long-term treasury reserves, institutional buyers may tighten market supply, potentially contributing to price stability or upward pressure over extended timeframes.
Some analysts argue that this type of strategic accumulation mirrors Bitcoin treasury strategies adopted by corporate entities in previous cycles. The long-term holding approach signals confidence in Ethereum’s role as a foundational digital asset.
However, it also raises concerns about supply concentration. Large non-custodial treasury positions can amplify market sensitivity to strategic reallocations or portfolio adjustments.
What the Report Excludes: The ETH2 Staking Contract
Arkham’s analysis deliberately excludes ETH held within the Ethereum staking contract, commonly referred to as the ETH2 deposit contract. That contract currently contains more than 77 million ETH, representing roughly 63 percent of Ethereum’s total supply.
The staking contract is technically the largest single holder of Ethereum. However, it does not represent centralized ownership. Instead, it aggregates validator deposits from thousands of participants securing the network.
By excluding staked ETH, Arkham’s report focuses specifically on liquid supply that could meaningfully impact market liquidity, custody concentration, and institutional influence.
This methodological distinction explains why centralized exchanges and institutional wallets dominate the rankings. Staked ETH is effectively locked and cannot be freely traded without withdrawal procedures. In contrast, non-staked balances held by exchanges and treasuries represent supply that can move more fluidly in response to market conditions.
 |
| Source: Xpost |
Retail’s Diminishing Dominance
One of the broader takeaways from the report is the shifting composition of Ethereum’s ownership base. In its early years, Ethereum was largely dominated by retail investors, developers, and crypto-native participants.
Today, large institutions and centralized platforms control a substantial portion of the liquid supply.
This transformation carries both positive and negative implications.
On the positive side, institutional participation enhances legitimacy. The presence of ETFs, corporate treasuries, and regulated custodians signals that Ethereum has matured beyond a speculative experiment. Long-term capital allocations suggest growing confidence in Ethereum’s technological and economic foundations.
Institutional inflows often provide more stable capital compared to retail-driven cycles, potentially reducing extreme volatility over time.
On the negative side, concentration introduces systemic considerations. When large custodial entities control substantial portions of liquid supply, operational disruptions or regulatory interventions can have amplified market effects.
Centralization Concerns and Custody Risk
The increasing dominance of centralized exchanges and large treasury holders raises questions about custody concentration.
If a handful of platforms collectively hold millions of ETH, any security breach, regulatory freeze, or financial distress event could create ripple effects across global markets.
Custodial concentration also affects governance debates. Although Ethereum’s protocol-level governance remains decentralized, economic influence can indirectly shape ecosystem priorities through funding decisions and validator participation.
Moreover, ETF growth and institutional custody structures may further centralize economic power within a limited number of regulated intermediaries.
This does not necessarily undermine Ethereum’s decentralization at the protocol level, but it complicates the broader narrative of distributed ownership.
ETF Flows and the Institutionalization of Ethereum
The rise of Ethereum-focused ETFs has accelerated institutional demand for custody solutions. ETF issuers require secure, compliant storage infrastructure, often relying on major exchanges or dedicated custodians.
As ETF inflows increase, so too does the concentration of ETH in custodial wallets associated with institutional products.
This trend contributes to a structural shift in market dynamics. Price discovery is increasingly influenced by institutional flows rather than purely retail sentiment. Large block purchases and redemptions can have measurable impacts on short-term volatility.
At the same time, long-term treasury accumulation strategies may reduce available supply, potentially creating scarcity dynamics during periods of heightened demand.
The Bigger Picture: Ethereum’s Structural Evolution
Ethereum is entering a new phase defined by scale, structure, and institutional capital.
The days when retail wallets dominated supply distribution are fading. In their place, exchanges, ETFs, and strategic treasury vehicles are shaping the liquidity landscape.
This evolution reflects Ethereum’s growing integration into global financial systems. Institutional adoption brings credibility and stability but also introduces new risk vectors related to concentration and systemic interdependence.
Market participants must therefore assess Ethereum not only as a technological network but also as an asset class increasingly embedded within traditional financial infrastructure.
Conclusion
Arkham Intelligence’s latest report provides a revealing snapshot of Ethereum’s ownership structure. Binance and Coinbase lead the rankings among non-staked holders, while BitMNR’s aggressive accumulation strategy signals the rise of large-scale treasury positioning.
By excluding staked ETH, the analysis highlights the entities controlling liquid supply capable of influencing trading flows and market liquidity.
The findings illustrate a broader transformation. Ethereum is no longer predominantly retail-driven. Institutional capital and centralized platforms now command a significant share of accessible supply.
As ETF demand grows and treasury strategies expand, the balance between decentralization and concentration will remain a central theme in Ethereum’s evolution.
For investors, the report serves as a reminder that ownership structure matters. In markets increasingly shaped by scale and serious capital, the movements of top holders can have outsized effects on volatility, stability, and long-term valuation.
Disclaimer:
The content published on nyohoka.com is for informational and educational purposes only. It should not be considered as financial, investment, trading, or legal advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset investments carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors.
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information provided. nyohoka.com and its authors are not responsible for any losses or damages that may arise from the use of this content.
Always do your own research (DYOR) and consult with a qualified professional before making any financial decisions
